PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: The Petitioners have invoked the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of writ of prohibition or any other appropriate writs/orders/directions, restraining the respondents from forcibly and illegally dispossessing the petitioner from the physical and peaceful possession of his property, having Old Khata No. 1040, Plot No. 38, Old Khata no. 11...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: Heard Mr. P.N. Shahi, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. Avinash Shekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Vikas Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent-State and Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, learned counsel for the Election Commission of India. 2. Learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner would mainly submit that present is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and is in the ...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: 1.Heard the Learned counsel for the parties. 2.The petitioner has filed the Writ application for the following reliefs: " (i) For a direction to the respondent not to encroach the land of the petitioner and not to establish the Electrical Tower over the land of petitioner situated at mauza Akshara Khata No. 21 Khesara no. 335 measuring an area of land 17 decimals having its boundary as North - Rasta, South - ...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: 1. The Writ petition is filed seeking a direction upon the respondent authorities for payment of the admitted dues of transportation & handling charges amounting to Rs. 25,38,129/- for the period of the year2014-15. 2. The brief facts, as culled out from the Writ petition are that the petitioner had entered into an agreement with the Bihar State Food & Civil supplies Corporation (BSFC) on 09.01.2015 for the pu...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in which the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :- "1. That this petition by way of Public Interest Litigation is being filed for issuance of writ of appropriate nature, order or direction commanding respondents to hold high level enquiry permitting respondent no.6 (sic) posted at Phulparas for last 25 years in exce...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the nature of a Public Interest Litigation, in which the petitioner has challenged the decision of the Tender Bid Committee dated 23.12.2024 contained in Memo No. 7729 qualifying respondent no. 6 in the Tender Invitation Notice No. 02 SBD/2024-25 floated for construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan in Mor Panchayat under Mokama...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 2. The petition is filed in the nature of Public Interest Litigation. 3. The petitioner has stated in the memo of petition that encroachment has been made in river Mahi and, therefore, the petitioner has filed the present petition with a prayer that appropriate direction be issued to the concerned authorities to protect the la...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: This Court has heard Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, learned Senior Advocate with Mr. Shubham Priyadarshi, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned Advocate for the State. 2. The challenge made in the present writ petition is the order dated 02.06.2020 bearing Memo No. 173 passed by the Inspector General of Police, Central Range, Patna, by which the petitioner has been inflicted with the punish...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: This Court has heard Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, learned Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. Shailesh Kumar, learned Advocate as well as Mrs. Babita Kumari, learned Advocate for the State. 2. Since both the impugned orders inflicting the punishment of dismissal from services are arising out of the one and the same occurrence, leading to identical charges and depa...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: This Court has heard Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, learned Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. Shailesh Kumar, learned Advocate as well as Mrs. Babita Kumari, learned Advocate for the State. 2. Since both the impugned orders inflicting the punishment of dismissal from services are arising out of the one and the same occurrence, leading to identical charges and depa...