PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in which the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :- "1. That this petition by way of Public Interest Litigation is being filed for issuance of writ of appropriate nature, order or direction commanding respondents to hold high level enquiry permitting respondent no.6 (sic) posted at Phulparas for last 25 years in exce...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the nature of a Public Interest Litigation, in which the petitioner has challenged the decision of the Tender Bid Committee dated 23.12.2024 contained in Memo No. 7729 qualifying respondent no. 6 in the Tender Invitation Notice No. 02 SBD/2024-25 floated for construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan in Mor Panchayat under Mokama...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 2. The petition is filed in the nature of Public Interest Litigation. 3. The petitioner has stated in the memo of petition that encroachment has been made in river Mahi and, therefore, the petitioner has filed the present petition with a prayer that appropriate direction be issued to the concerned authorities to protect the la...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: This Court has heard Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, learned Senior Advocate with Mr. Shubham Priyadarshi, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned Advocate for the State. 2. The challenge made in the present writ petition is the order dated 02.06.2020 bearing Memo No. 173 passed by the Inspector General of Police, Central Range, Patna, by which the petitioner has been inflicted with the punish...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: This Court has heard Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, learned Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. Shailesh Kumar, learned Advocate as well as Mrs. Babita Kumari, learned Advocate for the State. 2. Since both the impugned orders inflicting the punishment of dismissal from services are arising out of the one and the same occurrence, leading to identical charges and depa...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: This Court has heard Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, learned Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. Shailesh Kumar, learned Advocate as well as Mrs. Babita Kumari, learned Advocate for the State. 2. Since both the impugned orders inflicting the punishment of dismissal from services are arising out of the one and the same occurrence, leading to identical charges and depa...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in which the petitioner has prayed that the order dated 18.12.2024, passed by the Additional Chief Executive Officer-cum-Secretary (Respondent No.2) be quashed and the respondents be restrained from giving effect to the said order during pendency of the present petition. 2. The facts of the present case in nutshell are as under:...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: Heard the parties. 2. In compliance with the order of this Court, a supplementary show-cause affidavit has been filed, categorically showing that all the admissible amount under different head have been paid to the petitioner. 3. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that a copy of the supplementary affidavit has been served just in a while and he prays for a short adjournment. 4. Having considered t...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: Heard the parties. 2. The present application is filed for initiation of a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for their willful and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Court dated 18.11.2024, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 17349 of 2024, whereby this Court directed the District Magistrate, Darbhanga to consider the claim of the petitioner in the light of Rule 9(7) of the CCA Rules, 2005 preferab...
PATNA, India, Sept. 22 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 22: Heard Mr. Raj Kumar Rajesh, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr Binod Murari Mishra, the learned counsel for the Informant and Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh-1, the learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The present application has been filed against the order dated 13.09.2024 passed by learned C.J.M., Nalanda at Biharsharif in Deepnagar P.S. Case No. 338 of 2022 (G.R. No. 1005424/2020) whereby cognizance under Se...